Comments from readers
Monica Chen, Taipei; Jessie Shen, DIGITIMES Asia
Wednesday 24 December 2008
Add your comments
We have recently changed our search engine. Check the Advanced options to learn the new search rules.
Realtime news
- Musk says chip capacity will decide winner of AI race (Mar 21) - EE Times
- Google taps MediaTek for cheaper AI chips (Mar 17) - The Information
- European project gets $260 million for HPC chip sovereignty (Mar 6) - EE Times
- The trouble with MAGA's chipmaking dreams (Mar 3) - Economist
- Automotive chips: Gloom and doom or boom by 2030? (Feb 14) - EE Times
- Deepseek is more Wall Street than Silicon Valley (Feb 3) - Culpium, by Tim Culpan
- Tech CEOs try to reassure Wall Street after DeepSeek shock (Jan 30) - Wall Street Journal
- TSMC to make chips for cryptominer Bitdeer at new US fab (Jan 17) - Culpium, by Tim Culpan
![]()
CHIPX eyes Malaysia for 8-inch GaN-on-SiC wafer fabDublin-based semiconductor startup CHIPX plans to build...
![]()
Nvidia's H200 clear to sell in ChinaNvidia's H200 chip will be allowed to return to the Chinese market after CEO Jensen Huang's lobbying efforts to the Trump administration, a partial win...
Google, Apple, Matter new smart home innovations
Google and Matter are aggressively pushing into smart home innovations, while Apple's deployment still needs more time to be...
Adoption of LEO satellites in fleet management business
LEO satellites lead the global fleet management revolution as a key driving force for IoV commercialization.
Fixed network market and space industry of India
India's high population started to benefit the nation in accelerating the implementation of its broadband services and manufacturing...
Posted on Dec 25, 18:25
Actually, it's classic competitive behavior. Notice that Intel isn't pointing a gun at anyone, unlike people who use code-words like "anticompetitive." Nvidia are free to find another CPU to go with their chipset.Posted on Dec 25, 13:47
What? Intel is not providing a good product to its customers. That's very very bad. No doubt it makes good processors but why make consumers suffer?Posted on Dec 25, 07:42
Let's hope that Intel sells enough Atoms that they can get smacked for monopoly bundling.Posted on Dec 25, 07:30
AMD isn't because of ATI. How would it look if AMD worked with Nvidia? You have ATI but you're picking some other video GPU!Posted on Dec 25, 06:57
Given Nvidia's recent problems on coming clean about sub-standard manufacturing of its chips, I wouldn't want an Nvidia chipset in any computer I purchased. Nvidia is so yesterday.Posted on Dec 25, 06:28
"I don't know why AMD isn't publicizing it."Maybe, just maybe because it isn't better...
Posted on Dec 25, 02:34
Can you say "antitrust"?Posted on Dec 25, 02:17
Man, Intel has some cojones! Obama's DOJ probably won't be quite as accommodating to this sort of antitrust behavior as the Bush team was, and Nvidia will almost certainly file a complaint.Posted on Dec 25, 01:41
This is really pathetic of Intel. I will be strongly considering the Samsung NC20 over other Intel-powered netbooks because of Intel's heavy-handedness in the netbook market.Posted on Dec 25, 00:56
It is shameful that Nvidia even dare to try this. It's like a thief knocks at the door of a house and tells the owner, "can you open the door to let me steal something"...lolPosted on Dec 24, 23:09
Classic anticompetitive behavior.Posted on Dec 24, 21:11
Ha, nice to see someone doing unto Nvidia as Nvidia will do unto others. Maybe they can trade SLI for access to Atom CPUs?Posted on Dec 24, 16:01
Time for Nvidia to join forces with VIA once and for all, and create a Nano-GeForce combo to kick Intel right in the face. I'm disappointed with Intel. Ion has potential. I would buy such a combination. The 945 chipset is a relic.Posted on Dec 24, 15:14
I can't stop laughing seeing that a giant like Intel feels threatened by Nvidia.Atom is just a waste. AMD's Geode is better. I don't know why AMD isn't publicizing it.