Comments from readers
Monica Chen, Taipei; Jessie Shen, DIGITIMES Asia
Wednesday 24 December 2008
Add your comments
We have recently changed our search engine. Check the Advanced options to learn the new search rules.
- Musk says chip capacity will decide winner of AI race (Mar 21) - EE Times
- Google taps MediaTek for cheaper AI chips (Mar 17) - The Information
- European project gets $260 million for HPC chip sovereignty (Mar 6) - EE Times
- The trouble with MAGA's chipmaking dreams (Mar 3) - Economist
- Automotive chips: Gloom and doom or boom by 2030? (Feb 14) - EE Times
- Deepseek is more Wall Street than Silicon Valley (Feb 3) - Culpium, by Tim Culpan
- Tech CEOs try to reassure Wall Street after DeepSeek shock (Jan 30) - Wall Street Journal
- TSMC to make chips for cryptominer Bitdeer at new US fab (Jan 17) - Culpium, by Tim Culpan
![]()
Exclusive: SEMI president says semiconductor future extends beyond US-China rivalryDIGITIMES attended SEMICON West 2025 in Phoenix, Arizona, where the event set an 18-year record...
![]()
Nvidia at APEC Summit 2025APEC Summit 2025 takes place from October 31 to November 1 in South Korea. Amidst intensifying geopolitical and trade tensions, the event featured many...
NTN convergence
DIGITIMES believes that non-terrestrial networks (NTN) will serve as a foundational pillar in the transition toward 6G, integrating...
FOPLP tech development
The AI chip market holds tremendous potential - breakthroughs in FOPLP technology to overcome the RDL-first process barrier...
Tech and deployment of China top-3 PSU players
The three major Chinese power supply manufacturers leverage local industry advantages and technologies, actively moving toward...
Posted on Dec 25, 18:25
Actually, it's classic competitive behavior. Notice that Intel isn't pointing a gun at anyone, unlike people who use code-words like "anticompetitive." Nvidia are free to find another CPU to go with their chipset.Posted on Dec 25, 13:47
What? Intel is not providing a good product to its customers. That's very very bad. No doubt it makes good processors but why make consumers suffer?Posted on Dec 25, 07:42
Let's hope that Intel sells enough Atoms that they can get smacked for monopoly bundling.Posted on Dec 25, 07:30
AMD isn't because of ATI. How would it look if AMD worked with Nvidia? You have ATI but you're picking some other video GPU!Posted on Dec 25, 06:57
Given Nvidia's recent problems on coming clean about sub-standard manufacturing of its chips, I wouldn't want an Nvidia chipset in any computer I purchased. Nvidia is so yesterday.Posted on Dec 25, 06:28
"I don't know why AMD isn't publicizing it."Maybe, just maybe because it isn't better...
Posted on Dec 25, 02:34
Can you say "antitrust"?Posted on Dec 25, 02:17
Man, Intel has some cojones! Obama's DOJ probably won't be quite as accommodating to this sort of antitrust behavior as the Bush team was, and Nvidia will almost certainly file a complaint.Posted on Dec 25, 01:41
This is really pathetic of Intel. I will be strongly considering the Samsung NC20 over other Intel-powered netbooks because of Intel's heavy-handedness in the netbook market.Posted on Dec 25, 00:56
It is shameful that Nvidia even dare to try this. It's like a thief knocks at the door of a house and tells the owner, "can you open the door to let me steal something"...lolPosted on Dec 24, 23:09
Classic anticompetitive behavior.Posted on Dec 24, 21:11
Ha, nice to see someone doing unto Nvidia as Nvidia will do unto others. Maybe they can trade SLI for access to Atom CPUs?Posted on Dec 24, 16:01
Time for Nvidia to join forces with VIA once and for all, and create a Nano-GeForce combo to kick Intel right in the face. I'm disappointed with Intel. Ion has potential. I would buy such a combination. The 945 chipset is a relic.Posted on Dec 24, 15:14
I can't stop laughing seeing that a giant like Intel feels threatened by Nvidia.Atom is just a waste. AMD's Geode is better. I don't know why AMD isn't publicizing it.