Infineon Technologies' acquisition of GaN Systems has bolstered its wide bandgap semiconductor portfolio...
However, Intel's continued financial struggles led to the replacement of former CEO Pat Gelsinger with Lip-Bu Tan, who recently found himself a target...
Humanoid robotics, 2025 - Market trends, critical components & strategic shifts
DIGITIMES believes that due to the high cost of hardware components, humanoid robots can hardly see rapid adoption across various...
Innolux deployments with Pioneer acquisition
Innolux to invest NT$33.7 billion to acquire Pioneer, a move driven by three key strategic initiatives to expand its automotive...
South Korea panel maker business status
South Korea's two major panel makers have made progress in restructuring their businesses and will continue to strengthen OLED...
Posted on Nov 12, 16:25
They should try getting a working 65nm quad-core first, don't you think?Posted on Nov 11, 17:53
They could do an Intel and package two chips together to give an 8 core almost straight away. Intel would be unable to answer that.Posted on Nov 10, 10:51
But lots of programs aren't even optimized for that many cores at the moment, so having 8 cores won't necessarily make AMD better off...Posted on Nov 10, 07:16
8-cores? It is already very costly to make "native" quad core it has been proven that there is no performance gain. How can AMD make 8-core CPU? a 560 mm^2 die?Posted on Nov 10, 00:35
ahahaha... too late... Nehalem can already do 8 cores and if you add in HT... that will be 16 cores = 16 threads...Plus... if AMD can't do 4 cores in a timely manner... How are you going to do 8 cores?
Posted on Nov 9, 01:10
If I was AMD I would just skip over quad-core's and go to 8 core's and make Intel play catch up. MHz is pretty much dead its going to be how many core's they can cram on to one chip and how many flops they can do.Posted on Nov 8, 23:10
Do we know how these hold up clock for clock against Core 2 parts?