CONNECT WITH US

Building the Foundation of Trust: Achieving ISO/SAE 21434 Compliance in Automotive Systems Using Sec

News highlights

Understanding ISO/SAE 21434: A Mandatory Directive for Cybersecurity Engineering. Windbond

As vehicles become increasingly intelligent and connected, the complexity of electronic/electrical (E/E) systems is growing exponentially. The automotive industry faces unprecedented cybersecurity challenges. Attackers are no longer theoretical threats—they are real entities capable of remotely controlling critical vehicle functions and stealing sensitive data. To address this escalating situation, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) jointly released the ISO/SAE 21434 standard, providing a comprehensive and authoritative framework for cybersecurity engineering in road vehicles. This standard is not just a technical guide but a fundamental engineering directive that embeds cybersecurity throughout the entire lifecycle of automotive products.

Lifecycle Imperative: Security Begins with Design, Not After the Fact

The core philosophy of ISO/SAE 21434 is its comprehensive coverage of the entire product lifecycle, marking a paradigm shift in automotive safety thinking. Traditionally, security was considered a late-stage add-on or a reactive measure after vulnerabilities were discovered. However, the 21434 standard clearly states that such reactive approaches are no longer sufficient. Cybersecurity considerations must span every phase—from concept design, product development, manufacturing, operation, maintenance, to final decommissioning.

This "Security-by-Design" methodology means cybersecurity must be a core design parameter from the earliest stages of a project. The standard applies to all E/E systems, software, hardware components, and interfaces within road vehicles. This leads to a critical conclusion: every component in the system, no matter how small, becomes part of the cybersecurity chain. Even a seemingly insignificant memory chip can directly impact the cybersecurity posture of its ECU and the entire vehicle. Therefore, choosing components like memory during the concept phase is no longer just about performance and cost—it's a strategic security decision.

The complexity of the automotive supply chain further emphasizes this point. From OEMs to Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers, collaboration is tight. ISO/SAE 21434 provides a common language and framework to ensure cybersecurity responsibilities and requirements are clearly communicated and enforced throughout the supply chain. For hardware components like NOR Flash, adherence to secure development processes and verifiable security features becomes a prerequisite for Tier 1 or OEM integrators to meet the standard.

Core Pillars: CSMS and TARA as Dual Engines of Compliance

To implement lifecycle security, ISO/SAE 21434 establishes two core pillars: the Cybersecurity Management System (CSMS) and Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA).

Cybersecurity Management System (CSMS)

CSMS is a systematic, risk-based approach that defines organizational policies, processes, rules, and responsibilities to continuously manage cybersecurity risks. It’s not a product but a management framework that must be built, implemented, and maintained by the organization. The goal is to foster a "cybersecurity culture" and integrate security considerations into daily operations.

Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA)

While CSMS operates at the organizational level, TARA is the technical engine. It is the cornerstone of ISO/SAE 21434—a structured process to identify potential threats, analyze attack paths, assess impact and feasibility, and determine risk levels to guide mitigation decisions. TARA bridges abstract threats with concrete technical countermeasures.

For example, TARA might identify a threat scenario like "an attacker physically tampering with ECU firmware." The asset at risk is "firmware integrity." To mitigate this, the system needs cybersecurity controls. Secure NOR Flash provides hardware features like write-protected blocks and cryptographic boot code verification (secure boot), which serve as these controls.

Thus, the choice of NOR Flash directly affects TARA outcomes. A standard NOR Flash might rate the feasibility of firmware tampering as "high," resulting in an unacceptable risk level. In contrast, Secure NOR Flash with robust security features could reduce feasibility to "low" or "very low," significantly lowering overall risk.

To learn the latest cybersecurity regulations and trends, download the hardware security whitepaper for free.

Mapping Secure NOR Flash Features to ISO/SAE 21434 Requirements

Secure Boot is the cornerstone of any secure electronic system. It is a rigorous verification process that ensures every stage of software execution from power-on is authorized and untampered. This process begins with an immutable Hardware Root of Trust (RoT) and builds a complete "Chain of Trust." If Secure Boot is bypassed, attackers can load malicious firmware and gain full control of the ECU.

A key activity in the TARA process is identifying critical system assets and defining controls to protect their confidentiality and integrity. These assets may include cryptographic keys, digital certificates, proprietary algorithms, user privacy data, or vehicle identifiers. Storing these sensitive assets in unprotected memory is akin to leaving a safe's key under the doormat.

Secure NOR Flash provides multi-layered hardware mechanisms to protect these assets:

- Configurable Secure Memory Regions

- Hardware Block/Sector Protection

- Built-in Cryptographic Engine and Encrypted Communication

Globalized and decentralized automotive supply chains introduce new risks, such as counterfeit or unauthorized components entering production lines or the aftermarket. These "component swapping" or "ECU cloning" attacks are key threats identified in TARA. Secure NOR Flash provides robust hardware authentication mechanisms to counter these threats, directly addressing ECU cloning and forgery threats identified in TARA. These mechanisms ensure supply chain security and component authenticity during production, and establish hardware-based trust between processor and memory—a core principle of secure design.

Summary Table: Threat Scenarios and Secure NOR Flash Countermeasures

Summary Table: Threat Scenarios and Secure NOR Flash Countermeasures. Windbond

Summary Table: Threat Scenarios and Secure NOR Flash Countermeasures. Windbond

Conclusion: From Chip-Level Security to System-Wide Resilience

In conclusion, the automotive industry is at a turning point where security is no longer optional—it is a prerequisite for market access. In this context, system architects and engineers must recognize that investing in foundational components is an investment in system-wide trust.

In the new era of automotive cybersecurity defined by ISO/SAE 21434, memory component selection is no longer a simple engineering decision based on capacity, speed, and cost. It has become a foundational and strategic decision that profoundly impacts the overall security posture of the system.

Winbond's secure flash memory solutions help system manufacturers meet regulatory compliance and enhance platform security. To learn more about Winbond’s secure flash memory products, please visit Winbond's TrustME.

To learn the latest cybersecurity regulations and trends, download the hardware security whitepaper for free.

Article edited by Joseph Tsai