Taipei, December 11, 2025: Dimerco Express Group ("Dimerco") has announced that it is strengthening its integrated, Asia-focused logistics solutions to help customers capture growth from AI and "Taiwan+, China+" manufacturing while managing risks from congestion, regulatory changes and shifting capacity

At COMPUTEX 2025, ASUS showcased its comprehensive AI infrastructure solutions, targeting the computing needs of data centers, edge computing, and a wide range of intelligent applications. With a robust product portfolio, ASUS brings to life the NVIDIA AI Factory vision, illustrating how AI will be deeply embedded into enterprise IT infrastructure. This evolution continues to drive forward applications and services that shape the future of AI and high-performance computing

Technology news, product launches and show highlights from the event attendees available for download (PDF).

Crypto investors in Asia woke to troubling news when South Korea's largest exchange confirmed it had lost 44.5 billion won, about $30 million, in a breach. The first signs were unusual transfers of Solana-based assets into an unknown wallet. Upbit immediately halted deposits and withdrawals and shifted its remaining funds to cold storage. The move contained the damage, yet it left millions of users locked out of their accounts with no ability to move funds.Control and custody in crypto depend on how blockchain systems are accessed.Credit: CryptoIn the broader landscape of crypto hacks, the scale here is smaller, but still significant. Earlier this year, the North Korean-led ByBit hack caused an estimated $1.5 billion in losses, while Coinbase was linked to another attack resulting in around $400 million stolen. Although Upbit's loss sits below those figures, it reinforces growing concerns about the fragility of centralized platforms.For many, the conversation has already moved past the incident itself. The real focus is what these events say about how digital assets should be stored and who should hold the keys.A "Small" Hack With Big ImplicationsUpbit is a major exchange in a country where crypto adoption is high, so users rely on it not only for trading but also for storing assets long term. A breach of this size sends people back to a basic but crucial question: how much control do you actually have over your funds when a third party manages them? The temporary freeze on withdrawals made that question even sharper. Even if your balance remains untouched, it is not fully yours if you cannot access it when it matters most.Custodial Vs. Non-Custodial: What's Actually At StakeA crypto wallet is more than a place to store coins. It reflects who ultimately has authority over your assets. With custodial platforms, such as exchanges, the service provider holds the private keys. This arrangement feels smooth when markets are stable, but during a crisis, it becomes clear that your access depends entirely on the platform's systems and decisions.Non-custodial wallets reverse the dynamic. Whether hardware or paper, control stays with the user. No one can freeze withdrawals, limit access, or intervene. You set your own security standards, and you retain full autonomy over your assets at all times.Why Custodial Wallets Still DominateIf self-custody offers stronger ownership, why do most people still rely on custodial platforms? Convenience remains the biggest factor. Custodial services offer easy onboarding, fiat rails, instant trading, staking and yield products, and recovery options for lost passwords. For newcomers, or for anyone who values simplicity, these advantages are hard to ignore.The trade-off is structural risk. Centralized platforms collect massive amounts of value in one place, which makes them appealing targets. Hackers do not need to attack thousands of users individually; one breach can expose an entire exchange. Even when funds are protected, the response often involves pauses, queues, and uncertainty. Users may avoid losses, but they give up control.What Non-Custodial Wallets Solve (And What They Don't)Non-custodial solutions eliminate platform risk entirely. If an exchange collapses, freezes withdrawals, or suffers a breach, your assets stay protected because they never leave your own custody. Users also gain seamless access to decentralized exchanges and DeFi ecosystems, along with cross-chain flexibility.Still, independence introduces new responsibilities. Managing your own keys requires discipline. A phishing link, a compromised browser extension, or an accidental approval can wipe a wallet instantly. There is no support hotline and no way to reverse a mistake. Non-custodial ownership reduces systemic risk, but it raises personal execution risk. That is not a reason to avoid self-custody. It is a reason to take it seriously.The Practical Middle GroundMost users end up blending both approaches rather than choosing one. A balanced setup usually looks like this:Custodial wallets for frequent tradingNon-custodial wallets for long-term storageCold storage for high-value holdingsThis approach accepts that convenience and sovereignty do not always align. Each user must decide where to draw the line based on their needs, habits, and risk tolerance.Final WordThe Upbit breach adds another reminder that crypto remains a target-rich environment for increasingly sophisticated attackers. There is little indication these incidents will slow down, so users should assume that even major institutions can fail.The safest strategy is to match your custody choices to your goals. If you trade often, some custodial exposure is reasonable. If you hold assets for long periods, there is little upside in keeping them on an exchange where you accept risk you cannot control.A simple rule applies. If losing access to your funds would create real problems, self-custody is not optional. It is essential.

Bitcoin's core infrastructure is continually being re-engineered with each Bitcoin blockchain upgrade. Consequently, these upgrades alter how Bitcoin is traded and how it moves throughout the market. Recent changes to the Bitcoin protocols have brought about shifts in the costs, speeds, and security of transactions, prompting market actors to reassess and reposition. The blockchain of Bitcoin is always in a state of refinement, and its underlying technology continues to strive for scalability, efficiency, and sustainability. But these upgrades entail much more than an optimization of code, as they can result in real-market reactions, influence trading volumes, and shift investor sentiment. This year, with improvements in the protocol, technical aspects have become a core factor that drives market dynamics. This article will examine recent blockchain developments, how updates on the network influence trading activity, why markets may react in a particular way, and what wider adoption trends indicate about Bitcoin's future. Recent developments in blockchain technologyThe Bitcoin network has undergone a number of key upgrades aimed at improving transaction throughput, reducing fees, and offering greater flexibility for future scaling. Perhaps the most salient consequence of these enhancements pertains to how they affect trading-most notably when market participants check the bitcoin price today. By utilizing publicly available APIs and exchange data, traders can track real？time price, volume, and volatility to better gauge how protocol changes feed into market conditions. In a similar vein, upgrades such as Taproot or further layer？2 enhancements will continue to drive faster validation and more efficient block propagation. These changes significantly enhance the network's value proposition and can have a measurable effect on the way users interact with Bitcoin.How network upgrades influence Bitcoin tradingUpgrades create short-term volatility from how developers propose upgrades and how it influence different market actors. For example, do block efficiency upgrades lower confirmation times and fee costs, and thus, encourage traders to reassess their positions?According to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, the Bitcoin network's efficiency continues to be a problem for market participants assessing the cost structure of transactions. Through modeling, the Centre explains the relationships, thus the reason trading volumes increase after an upgrade, as traders reposition from the expected upside.Upgrades also factor into liquidity; a set of upgrades to a protocol usually incites a spell of high trading activity across the markets; however, as the network's performance becomes more predictable, liquidity provision from the participants improves. Institutions expand their tranche sizes, retail users of the network adjust their trading sizes, and these change the order imbalance, order book depth, and spread.Market responses to protocol changesThe market response of Bitcoin to protocol changes may be nuanced, fusing technical optimism with risk awareness. Whenever there is an announcement or deployment of a major upgrade, it generates speculative trading whereby some actors buy in anticipation of long-term gains, while others hedge for possible delays or unintended issues. This has traditionally led to increased volumes and higher volatility as participants test whether the upgrade provides the touted benefits.After an initial disruption, markets settle down, but not always uniformly across all exchanges. Differences in technology adoption and node infrastructure often create divergence in how different exchanges price Bitcoin-especially when some platforms support new features sooner rather than later. With time, however, upgrades add to the resilience of the network and reinforce confidence in the development path taken by the blockchain. Trends in cryptocurrency adoption and investmentAdoption of Bitcoin and, more broadly, cryptocurrency is continuing to grow. According to global data from CoinLedger from mid？2025, approximately 562 million people globally now hold some form of crypto, which is roughly 6.8？per cent of the global population. This growth reflects not only increased retail interest but also broader institutional participation.Investment strategies increasingly reflect the technical trajectory of the network: As upgrades to the blockchain offer greater scalability and efficiency, investors signal demand for digital assets built on sustainable and performant protocols. On the exchange side, platforms are continuing to deploy tools-real？time analytics, risk？management dashboards and more responsive execution systems-to help traders gauge how technical changes might impact their portfolios.Institutional interest also responds to environmental and sustainability themes. Energy usage, consensus efficiency, and mining footprint have become increasingly linked to blockchain upgrades and investment sentiment. Ongoing research into electricity consumption and mining emissions continues to impact the way some investors value Bitcoin in the context of long？term ESG objectives. Future implications for Bitcoin trading and innovationThe pace of protocol development at Bitcoin suggests that upgrades will continue to play a leading role in its market story. The more efficiently the network can scale, the more transaction costs can shrink, and open up space for more entrants, both retail and institutional. Technical change will continue to drive market actors' responses, but over time, improvements in capacity and sustainability could stabilise the asset's financial profile. This upgrade is not limited to short-term trading effects only. Modifications made in technology transform one's viewpoint regarding Bitcoin as a digital unit: more expandable, effective, and better aligned with anticipated infrastructural priorities in the future.Knowledgeable changes in a protocol and their impact on trade and adoption trends, as the participants in the market comprehend them better, clarify Bitcoin's position in the rapidly changing world of crypto.

DBS Group and Ant International signed a Memorandum of Understanding on November 13, 2025, that connects Singapore's PayLah! digital wallet to Alipay+'s global merchant network. The partnership connects PayLah! users to over 150 million payment points across more than 100 countries, representing one of the year's largest cross-border wallet integrations. The collaboration removes currency conversion friction and streamlines authorization for Singaporean consumers making international purchases.Singapore's digital infrastructure has expanded across fintech platforms, AI research facilities and smart-city systems. The country's regulated digital entertainment sector has grown in parallel, with platforms on the Singaporean online casinos list now providing substantial welcome bonuses, rapid withdrawal processing and extensive selections of real money gaming options. These developments reflect Singapore's broader push toward comprehensive digital services that operate within strict regulatory frameworks while maintaining high consumer standards.The DBS-Ant agreement goes beyond retail payments. Both parties confirmed they will explore near-instant remittance capabilities between DBS customers and Alipay+'s 1.8 billion user accounts. Current remittance systems in Asia typically require one to three business days for settlement, with fees that can reach 5-7% of transaction value. The proposed infrastructure could reduce settlement windows to seconds while lowering costs through direct wallet-to-wallet transfers that bypass traditional correspondent banking networks.DBS chief executive Piyush Gupta said the bank plans to embed financial services in daily activities instead of treating them as separate transactions. Ant International CEO Eric Jing said cross-border commerce in Southeast Asia has expanded faster than the payment systems that support it, and the partnership will close that gap.The Monetary Authority of Singapore has backed tokenization trials and distributed ledger experiments since 2022. Project Guardian and Project Orchid both tested programmable money and cross-border settlement on blockchain networks. DBS and Ant confirmed they will research blockchain-based tokenized deposits, a sign that Singapore's banks are preparing for scenarios where traditional systems work alongside decentralized technology.Singapore holds its spot as Southeast Asia's main financial hub through rules that push innovation forward but keep the system stable. Microsoft Research Asia set up its first Southeast Asian AI lab in Singapore in September 2025. Razer, which makes gaming hardware, said it will open an AI gaming development center in the city in October. Cloud providers and chip design companies did the same earlier this year, and created a setup where fintech, enterprise software, consumer electronics and digital services use shared infrastructure.The remittance component of the DBS-Ant partnership carries weight for regional labor markets. Remittance flows within Asia hit $280 billion in 2024, based on Asian Development Bank figures, and Singapore, Malaysia and the Gulf states sent most of those transfers. High transfer fees and slow settlement have limited what families can do with remitted funds, and people often wait several days before they can access money sent for urgent needs.The instant remittance system could change how small and medium-sized enterprises handle cross-border working capital if it scales up successfully. Companies with operations in several Southeast Asian markets keep different banking relationships in each country to process local payments, and this setup creates extra costs and makes operations more complicated. Direct wallet transfers would let businesses settle invoices and pay suppliers without duplicate treasury infrastructure.The partnership builds on existing QR code payment standards that Alipay+ has deployed across Asia. DBS will integrate these capabilities into PayLah!, which currently serves over three million users in Singapore. The bank has not disclosed specific timelines for the merchant network expansion or the remittance features, stating only that both will roll out in phases.